header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Unitary challenges

How far do prerogative powers extend? Nicholas Dobson reports

In an outburst of good cheer, Samuel Johnson apparently once remarked that “when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully”. Literally speaking at least, there was no work for the hangman in the government’s announcement on 25 July 2007 that it would implement the nine proposals for unitary local government then specified, once the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill becomes law. However, some authorities did feel they had been hung out to dry in the whole process. And that feeling of twisting in the wind led to the legal challenges which came before Mr Justice Underhill in the Administrative Court on 10 October 2007 in Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and Congleton Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2007] EWHC 2279 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 124 (Oct).

In addition to the substantive claimant authorities (Shrewsbury and Atcham and Congleton) a number of other authorities were interested parties as potentially affected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll