header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 November 2007 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Unitary challenges

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

How far do prerogative powers extend? Nicholas Dobson reports

In an outburst of good cheer, Samuel Johnson apparently once remarked that “when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully”. Literally speaking at least, there was no work for the hangman in the government’s announcement on 25 July 2007 that it would implement the nine proposals for unitary local government then specified, once the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill becomes law. However, some authorities did feel they had been hung out to dry in the whole process. And that feeling of twisting in the wind led to the legal challenges which came before Mr Justice Underhill in the Administrative Court on 10 October 2007 in Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and Congleton Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2007] EWHC 2279 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 124 (Oct).

In addition to the substantive claimant authorities (Shrewsbury and Atcham and Congleton) a number of other authorities were interested parties as potentially affected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll