header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Unitary challenges

How far do prerogative powers extend? Nicholas Dobson reports

In an outburst of good cheer, Samuel Johnson apparently once remarked that “when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully”. Literally speaking at least, there was no work for the hangman in the government’s announcement on 25 July 2007 that it would implement the nine proposals for unitary local government then specified, once the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill becomes law. However, some authorities did feel they had been hung out to dry in the whole process. And that feeling of twisting in the wind led to the legal challenges which came before Mr Justice Underhill in the Administrative Court on 10 October 2007 in Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and Congleton Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2007] EWHC 2279 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 124 (Oct).

In addition to the substantive claimant authorities (Shrewsbury and Atcham and Congleton) a number of other authorities were interested parties as potentially affected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll