header-logo header-logo

An unjustified windfall?

19 June 2008 / James Counsell
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Employment
printer mail-detail

Should courts take into account events which take place after the notional date of trial in a claim for damages for professional negligence? James Counsell reports

In Hibbert Pownall & Newton v Whitehead (2008) EWCA Civ, [2008] All ER (D) 60, the Court of Appeal held that a firm of solicitors which was negligent in failing to conclude a mother's claim against a health authority for damages (for the wrongful birth of her son born with spina bifida) before the mother's death by suicide, was not liable to pay damages to the mother's estate for the child's care costs incurred after her death.

This important decision contains some useful reminders to personal injury and professional negligence practitioners of the difficulties of proving loss even when breach of duty is established. Of even more interest, perhaps, are the observations in the judgment of Lord Justice Laws as to the extent to which the court might be prepared to take into account unknown events which postdated the notional date of trial and which serve to reduce

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll