header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Peter Mcmaster
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail

Unlocking the treasure chest

Offshore trusts are opaque and unfamiliar to many practitioners but they need not be impenetrable, says Peter McMaster

Offshore trusts feature extensively in the financial arrangements of the very wealthy. Created for a variety of reasons, they may offer advantages in fiscal terms, confidentiality, superior arrangements for transmitting wealth between generations—and perhaps even solutions to insolvency concerns.

These trusts are created by settlors transferring assets at their disposal to trustees in overseas jurisdictions. The trust is commonly governed by the law of the offshore territory and subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of its courts. Frequently, the terms of the settlement provide no clear indication of who will ultimately benefit from the settlement. These trusts are commonly encountered in big money divorce cases, where their unfamiliar features can present special problems for those advising the parties.

The recent record-breaking divorce case Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, [2007] All ER (D) 425 (May) involved an offshore trust, Dragon Holdings Trust, with assets of £68m. Dragon had a Bermudan corporate trustee and was subject

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll