header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Peter Mcmaster
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail

Unlocking the treasure chest

Offshore trusts are opaque and unfamiliar to many practitioners but they need not be impenetrable, says Peter McMaster

Offshore trusts feature extensively in the financial arrangements of the very wealthy. Created for a variety of reasons, they may offer advantages in fiscal terms, confidentiality, superior arrangements for transmitting wealth between generations—and perhaps even solutions to insolvency concerns.

These trusts are created by settlors transferring assets at their disposal to trustees in overseas jurisdictions. The trust is commonly governed by the law of the offshore territory and subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of its courts. Frequently, the terms of the settlement provide no clear indication of who will ultimately benefit from the settlement. These trusts are commonly encountered in big money divorce cases, where their unfamiliar features can present special problems for those advising the parties.

The recent record-breaking divorce case Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, [2007] All ER (D) 425 (May) involved an offshore trust, Dragon Holdings Trust, with assets of £68m. Dragon had a Bermudan corporate trustee and was subject

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll