header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013 / Stephanie Pywell
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Untangling the law

Stephanie Pywell challenges a widely held view on the classification of delegated legislation

The nature and classification of delegated legislation features in most introductory-level law courses. For many years, most students have been taught that there are three types of delegated legislation: statutory instruments (SIs), byelaws and Orders in Council. Research using parliamentary papers indicates, however, that this method of classification is misleading, and that it is appropriate to identify two distinct types of delegated legislation: SIs, of which there can be considered to be five forms, and byelaws.

Forms of statutory instrument

SIs were created by the Statutory Instruments Act 1946. Section 1(1) is entitled “Definition of ‘Statutory Instrument’” and provides that there are two ways in which delegated legislation (“orders, rules, regulations or other subordinate legislation”) may be made. If the law-making power is conferred on the Crown, it is exercisable by Order in Council; if it is conferred on a minister, it is exercisable by SI. In either case, the resulting document “shall be known as a ‘statutory instrument’”. By definition,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll