header-logo header-logo

11 December 2008 / Elizabeth Wale
Issue: 7349 / Categories: Features , Damages
printer mail-detail

Update from the courts

Elizabeth Wale reports on high-risk sports and contributory negligence

Those who are limbering up for their annual skiing holiday may wish to pay heed to Mr Justice Foskett’s comments in Anderson v Lyotier and Portejoie [2008] EWHC 2790, [2008] All ER (D) 216 (Nov). Sitting in the Queen’s Bench Division Foskett J considered the duties of a ski instructor who had taken his adult pupils off -piste resulting in the claimant sustaining serious injury rendering him tetraplegic when he lost control of his skies and collided with a tree.

Off-piste activity
The claimant and his group, all of whom had skied previously, were assigned to Mr Portejoie for the duration of their holiday which had been booked with the first defendant’s company. On day three of the holiday the group progressed onto red pistes and had a first taste of off -piste skiing. The claimant struggled with it and bumped into a tree—this was not witnessed by Mr Portejoie. The rest of the group skied both on and off -piste and over moguls over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll