header-logo header-logo

11 December 2008 / Elizabeth Wale
Issue: 7349 / Categories: Features , Damages
printer mail-detail

Update from the courts

Elizabeth Wale reports on high-risk sports and contributory negligence

Those who are limbering up for their annual skiing holiday may wish to pay heed to Mr Justice Foskett’s comments in Anderson v Lyotier and Portejoie [2008] EWHC 2790, [2008] All ER (D) 216 (Nov). Sitting in the Queen’s Bench Division Foskett J considered the duties of a ski instructor who had taken his adult pupils off -piste resulting in the claimant sustaining serious injury rendering him tetraplegic when he lost control of his skies and collided with a tree.

Off-piste activity
The claimant and his group, all of whom had skied previously, were assigned to Mr Portejoie for the duration of their holiday which had been booked with the first defendant’s company. On day three of the holiday the group progressed onto red pistes and had a first taste of off -piste skiing. The claimant struggled with it and bumped into a tree—this was not witnessed by Mr Portejoie. The rest of the group skied both on and off -piste and over moguls over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll