header-logo header-logo

Update from the courts

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Christopher Russell unravels recent cases involving limitation and loss of chance

The dog days of August and September are often relatively fallow times for the evolution and development of personal injury law. However, a survey of judgments delivered, both in the Court of Appeal and the High Court, since the last of these updates reveals a clutch of cases addressing, among other things, limitation and loss of a chance.
Limitation

In Field v British Coal Corporation [2008] EWCA Civ 912, the court dealt with a claim for noise induced deafness. Field worked in Harworth Colliery for 21 years from 1982 when he was aged 16. He did a variety of jobs both above and below ground. Until 1995 his employer was British Coal. From an early age, and from at least 1985 when he was 19, Field had discomfort and temporary minor hearing loss which he attributed to wax and ear infections. In 2003 Field noted ringing in his ears and his wife complained that the TV was always too loud. Tests carried out by an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll