header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Update from the courts

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty discuss recent cases

In Levi v Levi [[2008] 2 P & CR D2 the deceased (D) had two children, I and S. D lived in a council property and applied to exercise her right to buy the property but died in 1989. Under her will D left “her share” in the property to I and her residuary estate to I and S equally.

I succeeded to his mother's council tenancy in 1992 and, exercising his right to buy, purchased the property for £41,250 in 1995. I could not raise a sufficient mortgage so he agreed with S that she would make him a loan, including allowing him to use funds from her share of the estate (I having already received his own 50%) to enable I to pay the balance of the purchase price (the 1995 Agreement). After the purchase there was an ongoing dispute between S and I about the terms of the 1995 Agreement, S's interest in the property and access to it. By September 1996 I

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Trio of recruits strengthens Switalskis residential property team

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Birmingham law firm appoints construction partner

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop accelerates Northern growth through strategic senior appointments

NEWS
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
back-to-top-scroll