header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Update from the courts

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty discuss recent cases

In Levi v Levi [[2008] 2 P & CR D2 the deceased (D) had two children, I and S. D lived in a council property and applied to exercise her right to buy the property but died in 1989. Under her will D left “her share” in the property to I and her residuary estate to I and S equally.

I succeeded to his mother's council tenancy in 1992 and, exercising his right to buy, purchased the property for £41,250 in 1995. I could not raise a sufficient mortgage so he agreed with S that she would make him a loan, including allowing him to use funds from her share of the estate (I having already received his own 50%) to enable I to pay the balance of the purchase price (the 1995 Agreement). After the purchase there was an ongoing dispute between S and I about the terms of the 1995 Agreement, S's interest in the property and access to it. By September 1996 I

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll