header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Update from the courts

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Christopher Russell discusses nervous shock and fraudulent claims

 

 
In Monk v Harrington [2008] EWHC 1879, [2008] All ER (D) 20 (Aug), George Leggatt QC, sitting in the Queen's Bench Division, concluded that Monk, who suffered psychiatric injury having rendered assistance to the victim of a construction accident, was not entitled to damages.

In January 2004, during the building of the new Wembley Stadium, a working platform fell 60 feet, killing one man and seriously injuring another. Monk went to the scene and tried to help both men. He subsequently developed symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and depression and was unable to work.

The issue at trial was whether or not Monk's claim fell within the claims of the class of persons entitled to damages for psychiatric injury caused by the admitted negligence of Harrington, Monk's employer.

Monk's claim was on two bases: first his involvement was such that he fulfilled the criteria to recover compensation as a rescuer and as such was a primary victim. Further, there was sufficient proximity to the accident

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Disputes firm expands fraud and investigations practice with partner hire

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Firm strengthens corporate tax and incentives team with partner hire

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Partner and senior associate join pensions team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When high rates fall flat
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
NLJ this week: Building digital bridges to justice
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Form N510—not just a box to tick
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
NLJ this week: Delegation or dereliction?
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
NLJ this week: FCA faces its toughest test yet
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll