header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Update from the courts

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Christopher Russell discusses nervous shock and fraudulent claims

 

 
In Monk v Harrington [2008] EWHC 1879, [2008] All ER (D) 20 (Aug), George Leggatt QC, sitting in the Queen's Bench Division, concluded that Monk, who suffered psychiatric injury having rendered assistance to the victim of a construction accident, was not entitled to damages.

In January 2004, during the building of the new Wembley Stadium, a working platform fell 60 feet, killing one man and seriously injuring another. Monk went to the scene and tried to help both men. He subsequently developed symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and depression and was unable to work.

The issue at trial was whether or not Monk's claim fell within the claims of the class of persons entitled to damages for psychiatric injury caused by the admitted negligence of Harrington, Monk's employer.

Monk's claim was on two bases: first his involvement was such that he fulfilled the criteria to recover compensation as a rescuer and as such was a primary victim. Further, there was sufficient proximity to the accident

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll