header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 July 2011 / Jamie Potter , Charles Brasted
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax
printer mail-detail

The upper hand?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

When does the First-tier Tribunal have a supervisory jurisdiction, ask Charles Brasted & Jamie Potter

The search for the boundaries—and bases—of a supervisory jurisdiction in the First-tier Tribunal continues. The first foray was made by Sales J in Oxfam v HMRC [2009] EWHC 3078 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 326 (Nov) where he concluded that the basis for such a jurisdiction in the finance and tax chamber of the First-tier Tribunal (and its predecessors) could be found in certain sub-paras of s 83 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994.

Since that decision, in which Sales J himself recognised his observations were obiter, a number of First-tier Tribunal judges in the finance and tax chamber have accepted at least a limited supervisory jurisdiction. The tax and chancery chamber of the Upper Tribunal is yet to consider the issue, although, in December 2010, Mr Justice Warren, president of the tax and chancery chamber of the Upper Tribunal, sitting with Judge Avery Jones CBE as both the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll