header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011 / Jamie Potter , Charles Brasted
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax
printer mail-detail

The upper hand?

When does the First-tier Tribunal have a supervisory jurisdiction, ask Charles Brasted & Jamie Potter

The search for the boundaries—and bases—of a supervisory jurisdiction in the First-tier Tribunal continues. The first foray was made by Sales J in Oxfam v HMRC [2009] EWHC 3078 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 326 (Nov) where he concluded that the basis for such a jurisdiction in the finance and tax chamber of the First-tier Tribunal (and its predecessors) could be found in certain sub-paras of s 83 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994.

Since that decision, in which Sales J himself recognised his observations were obiter, a number of First-tier Tribunal judges in the finance and tax chamber have accepted at least a limited supervisory jurisdiction. The tax and chancery chamber of the Upper Tribunal is yet to consider the issue, although, in December 2010, Mr Justice Warren, president of the tax and chancery chamber of the Upper Tribunal, sitting with Judge Avery Jones CBE as both the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll