header-logo header-logo

26 June 2026 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

US discovery, global consequences?

253189
© Getty images

US Section 1782 discovery in English litigation: Janna Purdie explores controlling use after production

  • Section 1782 empowers US federal district courts to compel discovery of documents, testimony (including depositions) or other evidence for use in (or in aid of) proceedings before ‘a foreign or international tribunal’.
  • For parties to English proceedings, it can also shape the forensic use of evidence across related proceedings and jurisdictions.
  • Material obtained under section 1782 is not automatically confined to the proceedings identified in the application.
  • Protective orders need careful drafting to control later collateral use.

Section 1782 of Title 28 of the United States Code is a US statutory mechanism for obtaining evidence in aid of foreign proceedings. It allows a US federal district court to order a person who resides or is found within its district to produce documents, give evidence or provide other material for use in proceedings before a foreign or international tribunal.

For parties to English proceedings, section 1782 may be especially attractive where relevant evidence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll