header-logo header-logo

26 June 2026 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

US discovery, global consequences?

253189
© Getty images

US Section 1782 discovery in English litigation: Janna Purdie explores controlling use after production

  • Section 1782 empowers US federal district courts to compel discovery of documents, testimony (including depositions) or other evidence for use in (or in aid of) proceedings before ‘a foreign or international tribunal’.
  • For parties to English proceedings, it can also shape the forensic use of evidence across related proceedings and jurisdictions.
  • Material obtained under section 1782 is not automatically confined to the proceedings identified in the application.
  • Protective orders need careful drafting to control later collateral use.

Section 1782 of Title 28 of the United States Code is a US statutory mechanism for obtaining evidence in aid of foreign proceedings. It allows a US federal district court to order a person who resides or is found within its district to produce documents, give evidence or provide other material for use in proceedings before a foreign or international tribunal.

For parties to English proceedings, section 1782 may be especially attractive where relevant evidence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll