header-logo header-logo

US wins extradition argument

17 September 2015
Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The US government has succeeded in its judicial review against a decision to bar the extradition of a doctor accused of child rape.

In January, Westminster magistrates held that Tobias Bowen’s Art 5 right to liberty under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) would be at risk if he were extradited. New York state law provides for “civil commitment” of sexual offenders after they complete their sentence if they are considered still dangerous and suffering from a predisposition to repeat sexual offending.

Bowen, who has joint US/Liberian citizenship, was tracked by detectives working with the US Marshals Fugitive Task Force to the Netherlands and then to Heathrow Airport, where he was taken into custody.

Allowing the appeal, in Government of the US v Tobias Bowen [2015] EWHC 1873 (Admin), Lord Justice Burnett said: “We are satisfied that the New York process by which a civil commitment order may be made under Art 10 would be consistent with Art 5 ECHR if enacted in an ECHR state.

“In concluding that the Art 10 process could lead to the commitment of someone who was not of ‘unsound mind’ within the meaning of Art 5.1(e) the judge placed too much weight on the opinions of [an expert for the respondent] and gave insufficient attention to the strict requirements of Art 10… The New York law provides that before such a finding can be made there is a proper assessment and review of the offender by mental health professionals and psychiatrists.”

Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll