header-logo header-logo

17 September 2015
Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

US wins extradition argument

The US government has succeeded in its judicial review against a decision to bar the extradition of a doctor accused of child rape.

In January, Westminster magistrates held that Tobias Bowen’s Art 5 right to liberty under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) would be at risk if he were extradited. New York state law provides for “civil commitment” of sexual offenders after they complete their sentence if they are considered still dangerous and suffering from a predisposition to repeat sexual offending.

Bowen, who has joint US/Liberian citizenship, was tracked by detectives working with the US Marshals Fugitive Task Force to the Netherlands and then to Heathrow Airport, where he was taken into custody.

Allowing the appeal, in Government of the US v Tobias Bowen [2015] EWHC 1873 (Admin), Lord Justice Burnett said: “We are satisfied that the New York process by which a civil commitment order may be made under Art 10 would be consistent with Art 5 ECHR if enacted in an ECHR state.

“In concluding that the Art 10 process could lead to the commitment of someone who was not of ‘unsound mind’ within the meaning of Art 5.1(e) the judge placed too much weight on the opinions of [an expert for the respondent] and gave insufficient attention to the strict requirements of Art 10… The New York law provides that before such a finding can be made there is a proper assessment and review of the offender by mental health professionals and psychiatrists.”

Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll