header-logo header-logo

Value Added Tax

21 September 2012
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Case law , Tax , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Matthew Davies trading as Special Occasions/2XL Limos v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2012] UKUT 130 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 59 (Sep) Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Judge Howard Nowlan and Judge Greg Sinfield, 24 Apr 2012

If vehicles in question have been adapted so as to carry less than ten persons, that fact is fatal to any claim that the supplies of transport services with the vehicles in question should be zero-rated under the Value Added Tax Act 1994, Sch 8, Group 8 Item 4(a). It is immaterial that the vehicles might have been originally designed for the transportation of ten or more persons.

Nigel Gibbon of Northgate Company Services Ltd for the taxpayer. Ewan West (instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to Revenue and Customs) for the Revenue.

The Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VAT 1994), Sch 8, Group 8 Item 4(a) provided that zero rating applied to “transport of passengers… in any vehicle, ship or aircraft, designed or adapted to carry not less than 10 passengers”.

The taxpayer’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll