header-logo header-logo

15 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Value added tax

National Exhibition Centre Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKFTT 289 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 47 (Nov)

The criteria for a service to fall within the VAT exemption for financial services under Art 13B(d)(3) of the Sixth VAT Directive were well established. The critical test was whether the transaction carried out by the taxpayer truly effected, in the sense of brought about, a transfer. A number of principles were relevant to determining the issue. First, a transfer was the execution of an order for the transfer of a sum of money from one bank account to another. Second, it involved a change in the legal and financial situation existing between the person giving the order and the recipient and between those parties and their respective banks. Third, there was no requirement for the supplier to be a bank. Fourth, there was no requirement for a direct contractual link between the person executing the transfer and the ultimate customer of the bank. Fifth, the test whether a transaction constituted a transfer for the purposes of that directive was a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll