header-logo header-logo

Value added tax

15 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

National Exhibition Centre Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKFTT 289 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 47 (Nov)

The criteria for a service to fall within the VAT exemption for financial services under Art 13B(d)(3) of the Sixth VAT Directive were well established. The critical test was whether the transaction carried out by the taxpayer truly effected, in the sense of brought about, a transfer. A number of principles were relevant to determining the issue. First, a transfer was the execution of an order for the transfer of a sum of money from one bank account to another. Second, it involved a change in the legal and financial situation existing between the person giving the order and the recipient and between those parties and their respective banks. Third, there was no requirement for the supplier to be a bank. Fourth, there was no requirement for a direct contractual link between the person executing the transfer and the ultimate customer of the bank. Fifth, the test whether a transaction constituted a transfer for the purposes of that directive was a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll