header-logo header-logo

15 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Value added tax

National Exhibition Centre Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKFTT 289 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 47 (Nov)

The criteria for a service to fall within the VAT exemption for financial services under Art 13B(d)(3) of the Sixth VAT Directive were well established. The critical test was whether the transaction carried out by the taxpayer truly effected, in the sense of brought about, a transfer. A number of principles were relevant to determining the issue. First, a transfer was the execution of an order for the transfer of a sum of money from one bank account to another. Second, it involved a change in the legal and financial situation existing between the person giving the order and the recipient and between those parties and their respective banks. Third, there was no requirement for the supplier to be a bank. Fourth, there was no requirement for a direct contractual link between the person executing the transfer and the ultimate customer of the bank. Fifth, the test whether a transaction constituted a transfer for the purposes of that directive was a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll