header-logo header-logo

16 November 2012 / Paul Hughes , Paul Hughes
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Value creation

Why being a good in-house lawyer isn’t enough. Paul Hughes presents the case for evolutionary change

In-house lawyer numbers are on the increase in an ever more challenging environment. Evolution tells us that population growth means more variations adapting and outperforming others.This increase in diversity in the in-house population means greater numbers are delivering services which add more value...and they are getting noticed.

Why? As organisations seek greater competitive advantage in challenging global markets, in-house legal teams need to offer new ways to compete. In 2010 a Nabarro LLP report supported this, highlighting increased CEO expectations for in-house legal teams to help deliver an “edge” over rivals.

In-house teams not adapting to this changing environment may end up extinct—or “outsourced”—over the next decade. This has already started in the US, where a growing number of legal firms offer an outsourced “one-stop shop”. Where regulations allow, this is an attractive option if the existing team is not perceived as a “strategic asset” and remains instead an overhead. This has been happening across most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll