header-logo header-logo

Value creation

16 November 2012 / Paul Hughes , Paul Hughes
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Why being a good in-house lawyer isn’t enough. Paul Hughes presents the case for evolutionary change

In-house lawyer numbers are on the increase in an ever more challenging environment. Evolution tells us that population growth means more variations adapting and outperforming others.This increase in diversity in the in-house population means greater numbers are delivering services which add more value...and they are getting noticed.

Why? As organisations seek greater competitive advantage in challenging global markets, in-house legal teams need to offer new ways to compete. In 2010 a Nabarro LLP report supported this, highlighting increased CEO expectations for in-house legal teams to help deliver an “edge” over rivals.

In-house teams not adapting to this changing environment may end up extinct—or “outsourced”—over the next decade. This has already started in the US, where a growing number of legal firms offer an outsourced “one-stop shop”. Where regulations allow, this is an attractive option if the existing team is not perceived as a “strategic asset” and remains instead an overhead. This has been happening across most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll