header-logo header-logo

19 June 2015
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

VAT

Pendragon plc and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2015] UKSC 37, [2015] All ER (D) 106 (Jun)

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners against the decision of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, which had decided that the scheme at issue in the present proceedings used by the taxpayer Pendragon group, designed to exploit exceptions to the normal incidence of VAT, was not an abuse of law as defined in Halifax plc v Customs and Excise Comrs: C-255/02 [2006] STC 919 (Halifax). The court decided that the two requirements laid down in Halifax had been satisfied with the result that the scheme had been an abuse of law.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll