header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Vicarious liability

Various claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1106, [2010] All ER (D) 241 (Oct)

Settled authority established that the test to be applied in ascertaining whether an employer was liable for the acts of his employee was: (i) whether the employer had entrusted to the employee the performance of a task which it, the employer, had undertaken; and (ii) if so, whether there was a sufficiently close connection between the torts and the employee’s employment for it to be fair and just to hold the employer vicariously liable.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll