header-logo header-logo

29 January 2009
Issue: 7354 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Victory for care workers

Human rights

Banning care workers from working with vulnerable people without giving them an opportunity to answer is a breach of their human rights, the House of Lords has ruled.

In R (Wright & Ors) v Secretary of State for Health, Lord Phillips and four Law
Lords declared the procedure for listing people unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults— the POVA list—incompatible with the right to a fair hearing under Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Care workers can be excluded under s 82(4)(b) of the Care Standards Act 2000, and have to pursue a lengthy administrative process in order to challenge this decision. Baroness Hale said the effect of listing was to prevent a new employer employing them in a care position or to deprive them of such a position if they had one, while challenging the decision could take as much as nine months.

Issue: 7354 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll