header-logo header-logo

21 July 2011 / Steven O'Sullivan
Issue: 7475 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

A view from the coal face

Steven O’Sullivan surveys solicitors’ professional indemnity insurance

With recent hard markets, practitioners (especially those who are lucky and/or diligent enough to experience few or no claims) might wonder what insurers are doing to earn their increasing premiums, especially those who are lucky and/or diligent enough to experience few or no claims. Practitioners may therefore be interested to know about the experience of those of us who defend solicitors against claims, which naturally range from the nonsensical or outrageous to those where we are hard pushed to say anything in reply except maybe a challenge to the quantum of interest.

Lender claims

The big news over the recent years has been lender claims. Mortgage fraud and solicitors’ failings to lenders did not vanish between 1995 and 2005, but were masked by rising house prices meaning that repossession could take place without loss to the lender. Therefore, lender claims were a rarity.

With at best stagnant values since 2007, the lenders reaped the reward of poor lending decisions in the form

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll