The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is seeking views on proposals to clarify the rules where court hearings are held in private or where there are reporting restrictions in place. The amendments, first proposed by the Civil Procedure Rule Committee, would affect Part 39 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), ‘Miscellaneous provisions relating to hearings’. They would widen the definition of a ‘hearing’ to take account of any technological developments, introduce new rules for parties communicating with the court, and supplement the provision of transcripts. The survey, ‘Part 39 Civil Procedure Rules: proposed changes’, is available on the MoJ website. The deadline is 23 August 2018.
18 July 2018
Views sought on CPR clarification
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton
Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner
Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan
Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office
Blake Morgan—four promotions
Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices
NEWS
The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
