header-logo header-logo

12 December 2014 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Features , Property , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Vigilance matters

francisl

Restrictive covenants & freehold land: is now the time to wake up to the challenges to validity, asks Andrew Francis

It is over three and half years since the removal of the exemption of land agreements from Chapters I and II of the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998) on 6 April 2011. Given the publicity surrounding the decision in December 2013 in Martin Retail Group Ltd v Crawley Borough Council [2014] L&TR 17, [2014] 1 EGLR 42 and the decision of Mr Justice Henderson in July 2014 in Carewatch Care Services Ltd v Focus Caring Services Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 2313 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 163 (Jul) property lawyers with an eye on competition issues are probably thinking that enough has been said on the subject. This article attempts to show by reference to an even more recent decision that the price of security is eternal vigilance and that even after the passage of time since April 2011, there is a continuing need to assess the validity of restrictive covenants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll