header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Vigilance matters

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
12 December 2014 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Features , Property , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail
francisl

Restrictive covenants & freehold land: is now the time to wake up to the challenges to validity, asks Andrew Francis

It is over three and half years since the removal of the exemption of land agreements from Chapters I and II of the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998) on 6 April 2011. Given the publicity surrounding the decision in December 2013 in Martin Retail Group Ltd v Crawley Borough Council [2014] L&TR 17, [2014] 1 EGLR 42 and the decision of Mr Justice Henderson in July 2014 in Carewatch Care Services Ltd v Focus Caring Services Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 2313 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 163 (Jul) property lawyers with an eye on competition issues are probably thinking that enough has been said on the subject. This article attempts to show by reference to an even more recent decision that the price of security is eternal vigilance and that even after the passage of time since April 2011, there is a continuing need to assess the validity of restrictive covenants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll