header-logo header-logo

05 August 2016 / Rawdon Crozier
Issue: 7710 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The vindictive beneficiary

nlj_7710_crozier

Rawdon Crozier reflects on mixed messages & disclaimer by conduct

  • Conflicting lines of authority about what is required for a disclaimer to become irrevocable & therefore effective.
  • What is the requisite intention for disclaimer?

The story of the “dog in a manger”, is, like almost every other fable, generally credited to Aesop and, like almost every other fable, has a plot of the utmost simplicity: a dog climbs into a mangerful of hay and guards it fiercely against the cows, goats, horses and any other animal that might benefit from eating its contents. When a horse, reasonably, points out that the dog only eats meat and asks why the dog is guarding the hay so vigorously, the dog replies: “So no-one else can eat it.”

Sometimes a beneficiary under a will or on an intestacy can behave like the dog of the fable—the “Fable of the vindictive beneficiary” might run as follows:

  • An unhappy family consisted of a mother, two children and a husband, step-father to the children, whom he did not like.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll