header-logo header-logo

05 August 2016 / Rawdon Crozier
Issue: 7710 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The vindictive beneficiary

nlj_7710_crozier

Rawdon Crozier reflects on mixed messages & disclaimer by conduct

  • Conflicting lines of authority about what is required for a disclaimer to become irrevocable & therefore effective.
  • What is the requisite intention for disclaimer?

The story of the “dog in a manger”, is, like almost every other fable, generally credited to Aesop and, like almost every other fable, has a plot of the utmost simplicity: a dog climbs into a mangerful of hay and guards it fiercely against the cows, goats, horses and any other animal that might benefit from eating its contents. When a horse, reasonably, points out that the dog only eats meat and asks why the dog is guarding the hay so vigorously, the dog replies: “So no-one else can eat it.”

Sometimes a beneficiary under a will or on an intestacy can behave like the dog of the fable—the “Fable of the vindictive beneficiary” might run as follows:

  • An unhappy family consisted of a mother, two children and a husband, step-father to the children, whom he did not like.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll