header-logo header-logo

07 May 2021
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Virtual arbitration was a success during pandemic

Arbitration retained its popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic and adapted well to the change in circumstances, according to the 2021 international arbitration survey by Queen Mary University’s School of International Arbitration, conducted in partnership with global law firm White & Case

The survey, ‘Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World’, explored how the sector adapted to the unprecedented demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 1,200 private practice lawyers, in-house counsel and arbitrators took part between October 2020 and March 2021.

Some 79% of respondents said they would choose a virtual hearing over postponement if an in-person hearing were not possible, while 16% would postpone and four per cent would opt for a documents-only award.

Nine out of ten of the respondents said international arbitration was their favoured option, either on a standalone basis (31%) or in conjunction with alternative dispute resolution (59%). The top five preferred seats for arbitration were London, Singapore, Hong Kong, Paris and Geneva.

The use of technology, already widely used in international arbitration, increased during the pandemic, particularly in regard to videoconferencing and digital hearing room technologies.

Respondents liked the greater availability of potential dates for hearings, when held virtually, as well as the greater efficiency through the use of technology and greater procedural and logistical flexibility. However, they expressed concerns about the difficulty of accommodating multiple time zones and the impression that it is ‘harder for counsel teams and clients to confer’ and to control witnesses and assess their credibility. They also cited screen fatigue and the fallibility of technology as concerns.

Post-pandemic, the respondents said they would prefer a mix of in-person and virtual for almost all interactions, including meetings and conferences. Wholly virtual formats were narrowly preferred for procedural hearings, but respondents wanted to keep the option of in-person hearings open for substantive matters.

Abby Cohen Smutny, global head of the international arbitration practice group, White & Case, said: ‘The field of international arbitration is dynamic by nature.

‘Its hallmarks of flexibility and party autonomy allow it to develop and adapt in response to the needs of its users. Recent times have seen an increased focus on drivers of change such as diversity, technology, environmental considerations and information security.

‘The COVID-19 pandemic has also presented challenges to the way in which the international arbitration community interacts, with virtual hearings, conferences and meetings with counsel, clients and teams becoming the norm almost overnight.’

View the full survey report at bit.ly/3b9fahH.   

Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll