header-logo header-logo

07 May 2021
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Virtual arbitration was a success during pandemic

Arbitration retained its popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic and adapted well to the change in circumstances, according to the 2021 international arbitration survey by Queen Mary University’s School of International Arbitration, conducted in partnership with global law firm White & Case

The survey, ‘Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World’, explored how the sector adapted to the unprecedented demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 1,200 private practice lawyers, in-house counsel and arbitrators took part between October 2020 and March 2021.

Some 79% of respondents said they would choose a virtual hearing over postponement if an in-person hearing were not possible, while 16% would postpone and four per cent would opt for a documents-only award.

Nine out of ten of the respondents said international arbitration was their favoured option, either on a standalone basis (31%) or in conjunction with alternative dispute resolution (59%). The top five preferred seats for arbitration were London, Singapore, Hong Kong, Paris and Geneva.

The use of technology, already widely used in international arbitration, increased during the pandemic, particularly in regard to videoconferencing and digital hearing room technologies.

Respondents liked the greater availability of potential dates for hearings, when held virtually, as well as the greater efficiency through the use of technology and greater procedural and logistical flexibility. However, they expressed concerns about the difficulty of accommodating multiple time zones and the impression that it is ‘harder for counsel teams and clients to confer’ and to control witnesses and assess their credibility. They also cited screen fatigue and the fallibility of technology as concerns.

Post-pandemic, the respondents said they would prefer a mix of in-person and virtual for almost all interactions, including meetings and conferences. Wholly virtual formats were narrowly preferred for procedural hearings, but respondents wanted to keep the option of in-person hearings open for substantive matters.

Abby Cohen Smutny, global head of the international arbitration practice group, White & Case, said: ‘The field of international arbitration is dynamic by nature.

‘Its hallmarks of flexibility and party autonomy allow it to develop and adapt in response to the needs of its users. Recent times have seen an increased focus on drivers of change such as diversity, technology, environmental considerations and information security.

‘The COVID-19 pandemic has also presented challenges to the way in which the international arbitration community interacts, with virtual hearings, conferences and meetings with counsel, clients and teams becoming the norm almost overnight.’

View the full survey report at bit.ly/3b9fahH.   

Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll