header-logo header-logo

20 December 2018
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Visa shake-up after Brexit

Employment law solicitors have given a mixed reaction to Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s white paper on post-Brexit migration

The white paper, laid in Parliament this week, would let low-skilled migrants work in the UK for one year, sets a controversial £30,000 minimum salary for five-year skilled visas—many skilled professionals including nurses earn less than that—and abolishes both the cap on highly skilled migrants and the resident labour market test which requires employers to advertise jobs for four weeks. EU nationals would not require visas.

Julia Jackson, partner at Wedlake Bell, said: ‘This will both ease the bureaucratic burden on employers and speed up the recruitment process.

‘More broadly it's difficult to see how the Home Office will achieve its twin aims of creating a "business friendly" system minimising the burden on employers while recovering the costs of running the immigration system from those who use it. 

‘The White Paper specifies that employers will pay an immigration skills charge (currently £1,000 per worker per year for large companies reduced to £364 per worker per year for SMEs). In addition overseas nationals will continue to pay the immigration health surcharge (currently £200 per person per year but due to double this month). On top of this are visa fees and the cost of the sponsor licence itself.  For employers who have not yet engaged with the sponsor licence regime the additional costs are likely to be an unwelcome shock.’

Claire Nilson, Counsel at Faegre Baker Daniels, said: ‘The aim seems to be to bring EU nationals seeking to work in the UK post-Brexit in line with non-EU nationals in the same situation.

‘A short term visa option will be available, with fewer restrictions, for all applicants from low risk countries irrespective of their skill level. However, this will come with a one-year cooling off period so that, after the visa expires, the individual is unable to apply to return to the UK during that time period.

‘The short term route would not permit either family members to join the visa applicant in the UK or provide a path for permanent settlement.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll