header-logo header-logo

Vos lays into US human rights approach

08 November 2007
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

News

Bar chairman Geoffrey Vos QC took a swipe at US hypocrisy while staunchly defending the need for the UK to remain a signatory of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) in his address to the Bar conference last Saturday.

In his speech, Human Rights—Taking Liberties, Vos warned that Western governments need to get their own houses in order on basic freedoms, before they can start to lecture those in the developing world. “Muslim countries are not impressed with being told that they should adhere to the democratic principles of human rights and the rule of law by a nation that interns people without trial in Guantanamo Bay,” he said.

Although he said the US has a right to balance the need to protect its citizens, against the strictest adherence to the rule of law, it can not claim that it is universally thought that it has got the balance right.
“We need to avoid being guilty of what has been called `rule of law imperialism’, which can do more harm than good,” he added.

Domestically, he welcomed proposals for a new Bill of Rights and Responsibilities to sit alongside the Human Rights Act 1998. He warned, however, that it would be “an act of calamitous folly for us as a nation to withdraw from the Convention, which I believe underpins our authority in contributing to the world rule of law movement”.

Issue: 7296 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll