header-logo header-logo

Vos lays into US human rights approach

08 November 2007
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

News

Bar chairman Geoffrey Vos QC took a swipe at US hypocrisy while staunchly defending the need for the UK to remain a signatory of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) in his address to the Bar conference last Saturday.

In his speech, Human Rights—Taking Liberties, Vos warned that Western governments need to get their own houses in order on basic freedoms, before they can start to lecture those in the developing world. “Muslim countries are not impressed with being told that they should adhere to the democratic principles of human rights and the rule of law by a nation that interns people without trial in Guantanamo Bay,” he said.

Although he said the US has a right to balance the need to protect its citizens, against the strictest adherence to the rule of law, it can not claim that it is universally thought that it has got the balance right.
“We need to avoid being guilty of what has been called `rule of law imperialism’, which can do more harm than good,” he added.

Domestically, he welcomed proposals for a new Bill of Rights and Responsibilities to sit alongside the Human Rights Act 1998. He warned, however, that it would be “an act of calamitous folly for us as a nation to withdraw from the Convention, which I believe underpins our authority in contributing to the world rule of law movement”.

Issue: 7296 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll