Voter identification: what’s lawful?

01 July 2022 / Nicholas Dobson

Issue: 7985 / Categories: Features , Public

Nicholas Dobson examines the courts’ treatment of recent pilot schemes requiring voter identification in local elections

The Supreme Court has ruled that pilot schemes and orders under s 10 of the Representation of the People Act 2000 making different provision as to how voting at specified local elections was to take place were lawful and authorised for a lawful purpose.

Although it seems that Shakespeare’s Cleopatra was able to ‘make defect perfection’, she was clearly exceptional. For human beings and their systems are generally experienced as less than perfect. The election system may be a case in point. Back in 2005, Richard Mawrey QC in the Election Court found (in respect of a Birmingham City Council election) ‘evidence of electoral fraud that would disgrace a banana republic’. And in his Tower Hamlets Election Court judgment of 23 April 2015 (Re Mayoral Election for the London Borough of Tower Hamlets held on 22 May 2014 sub nom Erlam and others v R [2015] EWHC 1215 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 197 (Apr)),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Voter identification: what’s lawful?

Nicholas Dobson examines the courts’ treatment of recent pilot schemes requiring voter identification in local elections

The Supreme Court has ruled that pilot schemes and orders under s 10 of the Representation of the People Act 2000 making different provision as to how voting at specified local elections was to take place were lawful and authorised for a lawful purpose.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: The pension split at 25

Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women

NLJ this week: Exclusion zone?

A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws

NLJ this week: When silence speaks volumes

Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate

Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned

NLJ this week: The insider returns

Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome

Error message

Voter identification: what’s lawful?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly