header-logo header-logo

16 January 2020 / Matthew Hoe
Issue: 7870 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Voyage of recovery

14098
Matthew Hoe provides an update on disbursements in fixed costs cases
  • Counsel fees: a disbursement?
  • Scope: directly addressing fix costs.
  • Comment: hard negotiations.

Practitioners on both sides in fixed costs personal injury claims will mark the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Cham v Aldred [2019] EWCA Civ 1780, [2019] All ER (D) 160 (Oct) which settles important points about what can be recovered as a disbursement in such claims. While no doubt it will bite mostly on claimants’ costs, it applies also to defendants’ costs under CPR 45, s IIIA of the fixed costs regime. Underpinning the case was a dispute about whether fixed costs cover only the solicitor’s work, or all legal representatives’ work on the case, or indeed any and all work that is required by the claim.

Counsel fees

The appeal concerned counsel’s fees. The claimant was a child. His claim started under the RTA Protocol but exited because of a liability dispute between the drivers. The claimant’s damages were agreed in principle but approval was needed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll