header-logo header-logo

16 January 2020 / Matthew Hoe
Issue: 7870 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Voyage of recovery

14098
Matthew Hoe provides an update on disbursements in fixed costs cases
  • Counsel fees: a disbursement?
  • Scope: directly addressing fix costs.
  • Comment: hard negotiations.

Practitioners on both sides in fixed costs personal injury claims will mark the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Cham v Aldred [2019] EWCA Civ 1780, [2019] All ER (D) 160 (Oct) which settles important points about what can be recovered as a disbursement in such claims. While no doubt it will bite mostly on claimants’ costs, it applies also to defendants’ costs under CPR 45, s IIIA of the fixed costs regime. Underpinning the case was a dispute about whether fixed costs cover only the solicitor’s work, or all legal representatives’ work on the case, or indeed any and all work that is required by the claim.

Counsel fees

The appeal concerned counsel’s fees. The claimant was a child. His claim started under the RTA Protocol but exited because of a liability dispute between the drivers. The claimant’s damages were agreed in principle but approval was needed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll