header-logo header-logo

The vultures are circling

Inheritance disputes are spreading to the world of trusts. Michael Tringham reports

Yet another solicitor bemoans the rise in disputes over inheritance. Marvin Simons, Head of Dispute Resolution at Seddons, cites research showing that in the last six months alone one in 10 adults have been, or are currently in dispute, following a death—and blames the “vulture syndrome”. On average such disputes take 12 months to resolve, yet almost half the claimants receive no more than £250 for their pains.

Mr Simons says: “In many cases such disputes could have been minimised or even avoided altogether if the deceased had prepared a properly drafted and up-to-date will and discussed his or her intentions with the family before their death.”

According to STEP, the contagion is spreading to the world of trusts, with a marked increase in trust and estate litigation over the past couple of years: “As family fortunes suffer from the global financial crisis, it seems likely that the trend will continue to accelerate. Litigation can become hard fought, prove costly and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll