header-logo header-logo

Wait & see

18 November 2016 / Christopher Hutton , Aniko Adam
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Competition
printer mail-detail
nlj_7723_hutton

Christopher Hutton & Aniko Adam examine the implications of Brexit for UK competition law

    • Will European competition law, policy and practice drift in a different direction without the UK’s significant influence?

    It has been almost five months since the vote for Brexit. Although Brexit will likely have a significant impact on the UK competition landscape, it is not yet clear what that landscape will look like. It is also not clear whether there will be any transitional arrangements, or how those arrangements might work.

    As there continues to be more questions than answers, this article aims to highlight some of the most important areas for potential change, assuming a “hard” Brexit situation where the UK does not have membership of the European Economic Area (EEA) or an equivalent relationship with the European Union (EU). This seems to be a reasonable expectation given recent indications from the UK government.

    In particular, this article focuses on one key feature of Brexit for UK competition law. Brexit will bring to an end regimes whereby, both

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

    CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

    Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

    Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

    Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

    Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

    Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

    NEWS
    The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
    In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
    Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
    James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
    Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
    back-to-top-scroll