header-logo header-logo

18 November 2016 / Christopher Hutton , Aniko Adam
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Competition
printer mail-detail

Wait & see

nlj_7723_hutton

Christopher Hutton & Aniko Adam examine the implications of Brexit for UK competition law

    • Will European competition law, policy and practice drift in a different direction without the UK’s significant influence?

    It has been almost five months since the vote for Brexit. Although Brexit will likely have a significant impact on the UK competition landscape, it is not yet clear what that landscape will look like. It is also not clear whether there will be any transitional arrangements, or how those arrangements might work.

    As there continues to be more questions than answers, this article aims to highlight some of the most important areas for potential change, assuming a “hard” Brexit situation where the UK does not have membership of the European Economic Area (EEA) or an equivalent relationship with the European Union (EU). This seems to be a reasonable expectation given recent indications from the UK government.

    In particular, this article focuses on one key feature of Brexit for UK competition law. Brexit will bring to an end regimes whereby, both

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

    London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

    Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

    Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

    Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

    Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

    Foot Anstey—five promotions

    Foot Anstey—five promotions

    Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

    NEWS
    Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
    A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
    Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
    A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
    Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
    back-to-top-scroll