header-logo header-logo

18 November 2016 / Christopher Hutton , Aniko Adam
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Competition
printer mail-detail

Wait & see

nlj_7723_hutton

Christopher Hutton & Aniko Adam examine the implications of Brexit for UK competition law

    • Will European competition law, policy and practice drift in a different direction without the UK’s significant influence?

    It has been almost five months since the vote for Brexit. Although Brexit will likely have a significant impact on the UK competition landscape, it is not yet clear what that landscape will look like. It is also not clear whether there will be any transitional arrangements, or how those arrangements might work.

    As there continues to be more questions than answers, this article aims to highlight some of the most important areas for potential change, assuming a “hard” Brexit situation where the UK does not have membership of the European Economic Area (EEA) or an equivalent relationship with the European Union (EU). This seems to be a reasonable expectation given recent indications from the UK government.

    In particular, this article focuses on one key feature of Brexit for UK competition law. Brexit will bring to an end regimes whereby, both

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

    Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

    Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

    Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

    Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

    Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

    Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

    Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

    Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

    NEWS
    What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
    When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
    Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
    In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
    When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
    back-to-top-scroll