header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A walk in the park

Nicholas Dobson tramples on outdated concepts of qualified privilege & proportionality

The 10th August 2005 was not to be a good day for either Slough Borough Council or a visitor to one of its managed public gardens. For Ms Jane Clift, the visitor in question, on seeing a small child trampling through a flowerbed, uprooting plants and plucking the heads off flowers, protested to the child’s mother. However, the mother’s companion, who had been drinking, reacted badly, becoming extremely abusive and threatening. This led Ms Clift next day to speak on the telephone to Ms Fozia Rashid, the council’s anti-social behaviour co-ordinator. Unfortunately, however, as Ward LJ pointed out in the Court of Appeal on 21 December 2010, that conversation “went horribly badly” (Jane Clift v Slough Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1484, [2010] All ER (D) 243 (Dec)). As a consequence, Ms Clift was notified to various council employees and council contacts as falling foul of the council’s “Violence at Work Policy”.

Ms Clift had become angry about her

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll