header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A walk in the park

Nicholas Dobson tramples on outdated concepts of qualified privilege & proportionality

The 10th August 2005 was not to be a good day for either Slough Borough Council or a visitor to one of its managed public gardens. For Ms Jane Clift, the visitor in question, on seeing a small child trampling through a flowerbed, uprooting plants and plucking the heads off flowers, protested to the child’s mother. However, the mother’s companion, who had been drinking, reacted badly, becoming extremely abusive and threatening. This led Ms Clift next day to speak on the telephone to Ms Fozia Rashid, the council’s anti-social behaviour co-ordinator. Unfortunately, however, as Ward LJ pointed out in the Court of Appeal on 21 December 2010, that conversation “went horribly badly” (Jane Clift v Slough Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1484, [2010] All ER (D) 243 (Dec)). As a consequence, Ms Clift was notified to various council employees and council contacts as falling foul of the council’s “Violence at Work Policy”.

Ms Clift had become angry about her

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll