header-logo header-logo

19 September 2014 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail

Ward of court

backpage_0_0

Dominic Regan pays tribute to the wit & judgment of Sir Alan Ward

“This case involves a number of—and here I must not fall into Dr Spooner’s error—warring bankers.” Only Lord Justice Ward could get away with this mischievous comment. Recently retired from the Court of Appeal, he was what can only be called a character. He produced a string of exotic judgments but also maintained a sense of pragmatism. Many a decision was founded upon commonsense.

His opening paragraph in Sutton v Hutchinson [2005] EWCA Civ 1773, [2005] All ER (D) 127 (Nov) is a gem. “The appellant is a lap dancer. I would not, of course, begin to know exactly what that involves. One can guess at it, but could not faithfully describe it. The judge tantalizingly tells us…that the purpose is to tease but not to satisfy.” Since his wife, Helen Ward, is the pre-eminent divorce lawyer it is just as well that Sir Alan is in the dark.

Star Ward

While many on the bench understandably struggle with the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll