header-logo header-logo

12 June 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Warning signs

nlj_7656_robins

There is much in the coming parliamentary programme to trouble civil liberties-minded lawyers, says Jon Robins

At the end of the day it wasn’t so much what was in the Queen’s Speech at the end of last month, but what was left out. The much-trumpeted plan to ditch the Human Rights Act— “as raw a hunk of red meat” as most right-wingers could hope for, as The Daily Telegraph put it—was put back on ice.

In her speech opening the new parliamentary session, the Queen announced the new Conservative government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”— a significant retreat from their previous promise to disentangle the Gordian knot of Human Rights Act repeal within the first 100 days if the new government.

Despite that temporary reprieve, there is much in the coming parliamentary programme to trouble civil liberties-minded lawyers—an investigatory powers bill, reprising “the snooper’s charter”, allowing for the retention of records of phone calls, e-mails and other data; an extremism bill including new-style ‘extremism disruption orders’ to tackle those preachers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll