header-logo header-logo

12 June 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Warning signs

nlj_7656_robins

There is much in the coming parliamentary programme to trouble civil liberties-minded lawyers, says Jon Robins

At the end of the day it wasn’t so much what was in the Queen’s Speech at the end of last month, but what was left out. The much-trumpeted plan to ditch the Human Rights Act— “as raw a hunk of red meat” as most right-wingers could hope for, as The Daily Telegraph put it—was put back on ice.

In her speech opening the new parliamentary session, the Queen announced the new Conservative government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”— a significant retreat from their previous promise to disentangle the Gordian knot of Human Rights Act repeal within the first 100 days if the new government.

Despite that temporary reprieve, there is much in the coming parliamentary programme to trouble civil liberties-minded lawyers—an investigatory powers bill, reprising “the snooper’s charter”, allowing for the retention of records of phone calls, e-mails and other data; an extremism bill including new-style ‘extremism disruption orders’ to tackle those preachers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll