header-logo header-logo

12 June 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Warning signs

nlj_7656_robins

There is much in the coming parliamentary programme to trouble civil liberties-minded lawyers, says Jon Robins

At the end of the day it wasn’t so much what was in the Queen’s Speech at the end of last month, but what was left out. The much-trumpeted plan to ditch the Human Rights Act— “as raw a hunk of red meat” as most right-wingers could hope for, as The Daily Telegraph put it—was put back on ice.

In her speech opening the new parliamentary session, the Queen announced the new Conservative government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”— a significant retreat from their previous promise to disentangle the Gordian knot of Human Rights Act repeal within the first 100 days if the new government.

Despite that temporary reprieve, there is much in the coming parliamentary programme to trouble civil liberties-minded lawyers—an investigatory powers bill, reprising “the snooper’s charter”, allowing for the retention of records of phone calls, e-mails and other data; an extremism bill including new-style ‘extremism disruption orders’ to tackle those preachers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll