header-logo header-logo

12 June 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Warning signs

nlj_7656_robins

There is much in the coming parliamentary programme to trouble civil liberties-minded lawyers, says Jon Robins

At the end of the day it wasn’t so much what was in the Queen’s Speech at the end of last month, but what was left out. The much-trumpeted plan to ditch the Human Rights Act— “as raw a hunk of red meat” as most right-wingers could hope for, as The Daily Telegraph put it—was put back on ice.

In her speech opening the new parliamentary session, the Queen announced the new Conservative government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”— a significant retreat from their previous promise to disentangle the Gordian knot of Human Rights Act repeal within the first 100 days if the new government.

Despite that temporary reprieve, there is much in the coming parliamentary programme to trouble civil liberties-minded lawyers—an investigatory powers bill, reprising “the snooper’s charter”, allowing for the retention of records of phone calls, e-mails and other data; an extremism bill including new-style ‘extremism disruption orders’ to tackle those preachers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
back-to-top-scroll