header-logo header-logo

14 September 2012 / Lehna Hewitt , Kim Beatson
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Features , Family , Costs
printer mail-detail

Waste not...

istock_000013952999medium_4

Kim Beatson & Lehna Hewitt track the latest developments surrounding wasted costs orders in family proceedings

A legal adviser whose conduct is improper, unreasonable or negligent can be ordered to pay the costs incurred by their own client or another party as a result of such conduct.

The term “legal adviser” has been broadly interpreted and could include counsel, solicitors or another representative. Counsel’s responsibility may include drafting and settling proceedings and is not limited to advocacy (Brown v Bennett [2002] 2 All ER 273).

A wasted costs order can even be made against expert witnesses who cause significant expense as a result of failing in their duty to the court (Phillips and Other v Symes and Others 2 [2004] EWHC 2330 (Ch), [2005] 4 All ER 519).

Making a wasted costs order

The power of the court to make a wasted costs order is found in s 51(6) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and now

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firmexpands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
The treasury has sought to reassure the legal profession over concerns about cost, bureaucracy and independence when the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over regulation of anti-money laundering compliance
One out of two barristers has come under pressure from clients to act unethically, according to the results of this year’s Barristers’ Working Lives survey
The Court of Appeal has held the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) was wrong to set aside a Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) decision on unfair pricing of phenytoin, an epilepsy drug
A flagship employment law reform is due to come into effect on 1 July, extending unfair dismissal rights to employees after six months in their job instead of two years
back-to-top-scroll