header-logo header-logo

01 February 2007 / Beverley Flynn
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

WEEE—the way to go

Beverley Flynn explains the WEEE Directive and its impact on business

The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/3289) (the regulations) which implement Directive 2002/96/EC (the Directive) were laid before Parliament on 12 December 2006. The UK should have implemented the Directive back in 2005 but this was delayed, largely due to numerous rounds of consultation. The regulations come into effect over a period of time with final implementation on 1 July 2007. The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is expected to publish updated guidance shortly.

The Directive creates a regime to reduce the impact on the environment of waste electrical and electronic equipment—hence the acronyms WEEE and EEE. Its aim is to facilitate the reuse and recycling of WEEE. The regulations require that producers of EEE, who put EEE on the UK market, join an approved producer compliance scheme by 15 March 2007, ready for full compliance by July 2007. Distributors who supply EEE for household use will also be required to either join the distributor take-back scheme or offer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll