header-logo header-logo

01 February 2007 / Beverley Flynn
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

WEEE—the way to go

Beverley Flynn explains the WEEE Directive and its impact on business

The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/3289) (the regulations) which implement Directive 2002/96/EC (the Directive) were laid before Parliament on 12 December 2006. The UK should have implemented the Directive back in 2005 but this was delayed, largely due to numerous rounds of consultation. The regulations come into effect over a period of time with final implementation on 1 July 2007. The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is expected to publish updated guidance shortly.

The Directive creates a regime to reduce the impact on the environment of waste electrical and electronic equipment—hence the acronyms WEEE and EEE. Its aim is to facilitate the reuse and recycling of WEEE. The regulations require that producers of EEE, who put EEE on the UK market, join an approved producer compliance scheme by 15 March 2007, ready for full compliance by July 2007. Distributors who supply EEE for household use will also be required to either join the distributor take-back scheme or offer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll