header-logo header-logo

The weekend effect

27 April 2016 / David Locke
Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The government’s assertions on weekend mortality in hospitals are bold & unsupported, says David Locke, but there may be a real issue about patient harm

It is axiomatic that as soon as an argument becomes politicised, the facts are lost among the rhetoric. Never has this been truer than with the current discourse concerning the new junior doctor contract.

Misreading the statistics

From a medico-legal perspective, the debate has opened up an interesting area of discussion in relation to the statistics surrounding weekend mortality. Much of the controversy arises from the frequently misquoted paper produced by various luminaries, including Bruce Keough, the National Medical Director, and published in the British Medical Journal in September 2015 (BMJ 2015; 351: h4596). The paper was entitled, “Increased mortality associated with weekend hospital admission: a case for expanded 7 day services?”. The all-important question-mark notwithstanding, one wonders whether with the benefit of hindsight an alternative title might have been preferred.

The paper has been wrongly cited as providing statistical evidence that weekend staffing levels are directly attributable to increased patient mortality,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll