header-logo header-logo

04 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Confidential information

BVC v EWF [2019] EWHC 2506 (QB), [2019] All ER (D) 14 (Oct)

The claimant, a UK trained doctor, was from a country where homosexuality was illegal. He was bisexual and wished to keep his sexual lifestyle private. The Queen's Bench Division granted the claimant summary judgment for a permanent injunction to restrain the further misuse of his private information by the defendant, with whom he had had a homosexual relationship, and for an assessment of damages. The privacy claim arose from the publication, on a website which the defendant had created, of his account of his homosexual relationship with the claimant. The court held that the information which the defendant had disclosed, concerning the claimant's sexuality and sexual behaviour, among other things, was at the core of the values which were protected by Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, that the objective test was satisfied and that the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the website information. Further, the court dismissed the claimant's application for summary judgment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll