header-logo header-logo

04 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Confidential information

BVC v EWF [2019] EWHC 2506 (QB), [2019] All ER (D) 14 (Oct)

The claimant, a UK trained doctor, was from a country where homosexuality was illegal. He was bisexual and wished to keep his sexual lifestyle private. The Queen's Bench Division granted the claimant summary judgment for a permanent injunction to restrain the further misuse of his private information by the defendant, with whom he had had a homosexual relationship, and for an assessment of damages. The privacy claim arose from the publication, on a website which the defendant had created, of his account of his homosexual relationship with the claimant. The court held that the information which the defendant had disclosed, concerning the claimant's sexuality and sexual behaviour, among other things, was at the core of the values which were protected by Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, that the objective test was satisfied and that the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the website information. Further, the court dismissed the claimant's application for summary judgment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll