header-logo header-logo

Weekly law digests

14 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Capital gains tax 

Higgins v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2019] EWCA Civ 1860, [2019] All ER (D) 25 (Nov)

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) had erred in finding that the appellant taxpayer’s period of ownership of an apartment had begun when he had exchanged unconditional contracts, rather than when he had taken possession, in order to determine whether the property had been his main residence for the purposes of private residence relief from capital gains tax under ss 222 and 223 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) had been correct to find that the period of ownership had not begun until the taxpayer’s purchase had been completed.

Damages 

Irani v Duchon [2019] EWCA Civ 1846, [2019] All ER (D) 45 (Nov)

Following the claimant’s injuries sustained in an accident for which the defendant had admitted liability, the claimant was made redundant. In assessing damages, the judge had been entitled to find that the present case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll