header-logo header-logo

Weekly law digests

04 May 2018
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Animal welfare

Barker and another v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals [2018] EWHC 880 (Admin) [2018] All ER (D) 168 (Jan)

The proceedings concerned the first case to reach to High Court on the issue of sentencing for an offence, under s 9 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006, of failing to take such steps as were reasonable, in all the circumstances, to ensure that the needs of an animal, for which a person was responsible, were met to the extent required by good practice. The appellants had pleaded guilty in the magistrates’ court to two offences under s 9 of the Act and had, among other things, been disqualified from owning or keeping any animal for a period of seven years, subject to one exception. The Crown Court upheld the disqualification order, but varied it to permit the appellants to own and keep terrapins. In dismissing the appellants’ appeal by way of case stated, the Administrative Court ruled that an ‘all animals’ prohibition under the Act was not wrong in principle

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll