header-logo header-logo

02 August 2018
Issue: 7804 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Constitutional law

R (on the application of the Freedom and Justice Party and others) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another (Amnesty International and another intervening) [2018] EWCA Civ 1719, [2018] All ER (D) 127 (Jul)

The Divisional Court had been correct to hold that a rule of customary international law had been identified which obliged a state to grant to the members of a special mission, which the state accepted and recognised as such, immunity from arrest or detention and from criminal proceedings for the duration of the special mission’s visit. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the claimants’ appeal, further held that, in accordance with the presumption that customary international law should shape the common law, such immunities were recognised by the common law.

Costs

McDermott v InHealth Ltd [2018] EWHC 1835 (QB), [2018] All ER (D) 132 (Jul)

The district judge had erred in the exercise of his discretion that there should be a limit on the claimant’s recovery of costs as a result of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll