header-logo header-logo

27 September 2018
Issue: 7810 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Bankruptcy

Reynard v Fox [2018] EWHC 2141 (Ch), [2018] All ER (D) 51 (Sep)

The Chancery Division dismissed the applicant’s application, under s 304 of the Insolvency Act 1986, for the court’s permission to bring a claim against the respondent former trustee in bankruptcy, alleging negligence in the administration of the bankrupt’s estate. The court held, among other things, that the claim lacked particularity, that applicant had filed no evidence in support of his application, and that the question had already been raised in original proceedings brought by the applicant under s 303 of the Act, which had failed.

Confidential information

Buccioni v Banca d’Italia (Banca Network Investimenti SpA, in liquidation) C-594/16, [2018] All ER (D) 37 (Sep)

Article 53(1) of Directive (EU) 2013/36 had to be interpreted as not precluding the competent authorities of the member states from disclosing confidential information to a person who so requested, in order to be able to institute civil or commercial proceedings with a view to protecting proprietary interests which were prejudiced as a result of the compulsory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll