header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Arbitration

A v B [2018] EWHC 2325 (Comm), [2018] All ER (D) 81 (Oct)

The claimant owners’ applications to challenge an award for serious irregularity failed, in a claim relating to the time-chartering of a vessel. The Commercial Court held that, among other things, the delay in the case had not constituted a basis of challenge. Nor had the court erred in its assessment of damages.

Company

Crumpler and another (Joint liquidators of Peak Hotels and Resorts Ltd in liquidation) v Candey Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2256, [2018] All ER (D) 78 (Oct)

The appellant liquidators’ appeal failed, in a case concerning money paid into court as security for the respondent solicitors’ fees, by a company that had entered liquidation. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that the company had retained the property in the money that it had paid into court, the money had thus continued to be one of its existing assets, and so it had been able to charge its interest in it to the solicitors by the charge.

Contract

University

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll