header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Arbitration

A v B [2018] EWHC 2325 (Comm), [2018] All ER (D) 81 (Oct)

The claimant owners’ applications to challenge an award for serious irregularity failed, in a claim relating to the time-chartering of a vessel. The Commercial Court held that, among other things, the delay in the case had not constituted a basis of challenge. Nor had the court erred in its assessment of damages.

Company

Crumpler and another (Joint liquidators of Peak Hotels and Resorts Ltd in liquidation) v Candey Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2256, [2018] All ER (D) 78 (Oct)

The appellant liquidators’ appeal failed, in a case concerning money paid into court as security for the respondent solicitors’ fees, by a company that had entered liquidation. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that the company had retained the property in the money that it had paid into court, the money had thus continued to be one of its existing assets, and so it had been able to charge its interest in it to the solicitors by the charge.

Contract

University

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll