header-logo header-logo

06 December 2018
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Company

Global Corporate Ltd v Hale [2018] EWCA Civ 2618, [2018] All ER (D) 146 (Nov)

The judge had erred in concentrating on the intention or state of mind of the directors when authorising disputed payments as dividends, rather than on the payments themselves, where the claimant was seeking to recover money paid as dividends by a company to the respondent company director. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the claimant’s appeal and also gave guidance on the correct approach to the questioning of witnesses by a trial judge.

Disclosure & inspection of documents

Sotheby’s v Mark Weiss Ltd and others [2018] EWHC 3179 (Comm), [2018] All ER (D) 135 (Nov)

The application of the first defendant company for inspection of certain documents succeeded, in a dispute concerning the sale of an allegedly counterfeit painting. The Commercial Court held that the correspondence, which was between the claimant auction house and two art experts, had not been brought into existence for the ‘dominant purpose’ of being used in contemplated litigation and hence would

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll