header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013 / Carl Calvert
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Property
printer mail-detail

Weighing up the scale

How can practitioners navigate through the difficulties of enlarging maps, asks Carl Calvert

This case of judicial review brought by the Trail Riders’ Fellowship (TRF) in The Trail Riders’ Fellowship & Anor v R & Dorset County Council [2012] EWHC 2634 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 15 (Oct) concerned five routes over which the claimants maintained that the public enjoyed vehicular public rights of way which were not recorded on the definitive map statement (DMS). To add a right of way to the DMS an application has to be made to the surveying authority, usually the county council.

In this case the application to Dorset County Council  was made on a map which had its basis on an OS 1:50,000 scale map enlarged to 1:25,000. Regulation 2 of the Wildlife and Countryside (Definitive Maps and Statements) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/12) (the 1993 Regulations) state that: “A definitive map shall be on a scale of not less than 1:25,000 but where the surveying authority wishes to show on a larger scale any particulars

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll