header-logo header-logo

15 August 2014 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7619 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A weighty issue

specialist_employment_bryden-salter

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter consider whether obesity is a disability

Without apparent irony, the opening sentence of the Opinion of the Advocate General in the well-publicised case of Kaltoft v the Municipality of Billund C354/13, 17 July 2014, notes that “obesity is a growing problem in modern society”. The question for consideration was to what extent European discrimination law applied to obesity.

The case of Kaltoft

Mr Kaltoft was obese, and it was common ground that he had been so throughout the 15 years that he was employed by Billund as a childminder. At the time of his dismissal he weighed some 160kg, being a shade over 25 stone, or about the same as an ostrich. Kaltoft brought a claim relying on two inter-related grounds; first that his dismissal based on his obesity was a breach of the general prohibition of discrimination in the labour markets, and second, and more specifically, that obesity itself amounted to a disability and thus infringed Directive 2000/78/EC.

Kaltoft’s employment as a childminder involved him being sent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll