header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Jacqueline Chaplin , Patrick Boylan
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

West Tankers' legacy

What options are left for parties faced with a breach of an arbitration agreement in Europe? ask Patrick Boylan & Jacqueline Chaplin

* * * * * *

Last month the European Court of Justice (ECJ) handed down its judgment in Allianz SpA, Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA v West Tankers Inc C-185/07. The result was not surprising: anti-suit injunctions issued in aid of arbitration were held to be incompatible with the principles of mutual trust and jurisdictional comity espoused by reg 44/2001 (the Regulation).

In August 2000 a vessel owned by West Tankers and chartered to Erg, an Italian company, collided with and caused damage to a jetty owned by Erg. The charterparty was governed by English law and contained an agreement to arbitrate in London. Erg claimed for its uninsured losses against West Tankers in arbitration, and Erg's insurers began proceedings against West Tankers in the Italian courts to recover the sums paid to Erg. West Tankers then sought an anitsuit injunction from the English courts to restrain the insurers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll