header-logo header-logo

West Tankers' legacy

26 March 2009 / Jacqueline Chaplin , Patrick Boylan
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

What options are left for parties faced with a breach of an arbitration agreement in Europe? ask Patrick Boylan & Jacqueline Chaplin

* * * * * *

Last month the European Court of Justice (ECJ) handed down its judgment in Allianz SpA, Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA v West Tankers Inc C-185/07. The result was not surprising: anti-suit injunctions issued in aid of arbitration were held to be incompatible with the principles of mutual trust and jurisdictional comity espoused by reg 44/2001 (the Regulation).

In August 2000 a vessel owned by West Tankers and chartered to Erg, an Italian company, collided with and caused damage to a jetty owned by Erg. The charterparty was governed by English law and contained an agreement to arbitrate in London. Erg claimed for its uninsured losses against West Tankers in arbitration, and Erg's insurers began proceedings against West Tankers in the Italian courts to recover the sums paid to Erg. West Tankers then sought an anitsuit injunction from the English courts to restrain the insurers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll