header-logo header-logo

26 November 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Blogs , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

What about the elephant?

Peter Vaines explains the Queen’s speech

Knock knock knock! Was this the porter from Macbeth or a reference to For Whom the Bell Tolls? Actually it was Black Rod knocking at the door of the House of Commons, but the message was the same.

Come in number 99 your time is up. Gordon Brown did not look happy.

He should have been.

This was effectively the first speech of the election campaign and he had the Queen of England reading it for him. She did not look very happy about it either but she is much too polite to say so.
The State Opening of Parliament is one of our great state occasions dating back to the 16th century. It encapsulates centuries of tradition and the relationship between the Monarch and Parliament.

It culminates in the delivery of the Queens Speech when the Monarch outlines the governments programme for the coming session. However, this was never going to be a speech of substance.

There is practically no chance that anything mentioned in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll