header-logo header-logo

26 November 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Blogs , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

What about the elephant?

Peter Vaines explains the Queen’s speech

Knock knock knock! Was this the porter from Macbeth or a reference to For Whom the Bell Tolls? Actually it was Black Rod knocking at the door of the House of Commons, but the message was the same.

Come in number 99 your time is up. Gordon Brown did not look happy.

He should have been.

This was effectively the first speech of the election campaign and he had the Queen of England reading it for him. She did not look very happy about it either but she is much too polite to say so.
The State Opening of Parliament is one of our great state occasions dating back to the 16th century. It encapsulates centuries of tradition and the relationship between the Monarch and Parliament.

It culminates in the delivery of the Queens Speech when the Monarch outlines the governments programme for the coming session. However, this was never going to be a speech of substance.

There is practically no chance that anything mentioned in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll