header-logo header-logo

01 March 2012
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

What a charade

Jonathan Upton considers how the court distinguishes a sham agreement

In Brumwell v Powys CC [2011] EWCA Civ 1613 the Court of Appeal considered the overlapping issues of sham agreements and management agreements in proceedings for the grant of a new tenancy under Pt II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the 1954 Act). These issues arise with surprising frequency in the 1954 Act renewal cases, and practitioners must be aware of them in order to properly advise their clients.

Brumwell

The appellant (B) issued proceedings under the 1954 Act for the grant of a new tenancy of the Wyeside Camping and Caravan Park, Llangurig Road, Rhayader, Powys (the park). The park has been used as a site for touring and static caravans and as a camping ground since the 1960s. This business was carried on initially by the Radnorshire District Council and then, following local government reorganisation in 1996, by its successor, Powys County Council (the council). B first came to the park in 1995 to perform cleaning and caretaking duties.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll