header-logo header-logo

What drives lateral hires?

20 September 2016
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Culture rather than compensation entices City partners away from their firms, new research has shown.

A mere 15% of partners who switched firms were motivated by money, according to an online survey by legal search firm Major, Lindsey & Africa (MLA). Instead, more than three out of five said culture was the strongest factor attracting them to their new firm.

MLA’s inaugural London Lateral Partner Survey is based on the responses of 176 City law firm partners who changed firm in the past five years. Of those who selected culture as their reason for moving, two-thirds said diversity and inclusion played an important role in their decision. This was especially true for women—61% selected diversity as a key driver, compared to 21% of men.

Brent Harris, executive director, international operations of MLA, says: “Law firms should take note that prospective laterals are swayed more by leadership opportunities and cultural incentives than financial gain.” 

The key reasons given for leaving a firm were poor leadership and management.

Nearly 60% of lateral hires resulted in either new clients or the transfer of some of the new partner’s existing clients, and one third resulted in an increase in both.

Issue: 7715 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll