header-logo header-logo

What drives lateral hires?

20 September 2016
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Culture rather than compensation entices City partners away from their firms, new research has shown.

A mere 15% of partners who switched firms were motivated by money, according to an online survey by legal search firm Major, Lindsey & Africa (MLA). Instead, more than three out of five said culture was the strongest factor attracting them to their new firm.

MLA’s inaugural London Lateral Partner Survey is based on the responses of 176 City law firm partners who changed firm in the past five years. Of those who selected culture as their reason for moving, two-thirds said diversity and inclusion played an important role in their decision. This was especially true for women—61% selected diversity as a key driver, compared to 21% of men.

Brent Harris, executive director, international operations of MLA, says: “Law firms should take note that prospective laterals are swayed more by leadership opportunities and cultural incentives than financial gain.” 

The key reasons given for leaving a firm were poor leadership and management.

Nearly 60% of lateral hires resulted in either new clients or the transfer of some of the new partner’s existing clients, and one third resulted in an increase in both.

Issue: 7715 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll