header-logo header-logo

28 July 2021
Issue: 7943 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

What future for legal aid?

MPs have called for ‘urgent’ reform to civil and criminal legal aid, in a Justice Committee report

The report, ‘The future of legal aid’, published this week, highlights that criminal legal aid firms are finding it increasingly difficult to recruit and retain staff due to a ‘rigid system’ of fixed fees and low pay.

On civil legal aid, it argues early legal advice can make the courts operate more effectively, thus saving costs. It highlights the risks of sustainability issues and the resulting legal aid ‘deserts’, where people cannot access advice on issues such as housing, immigration and community care. It calls for a more flexible approach to funding, giving judges powers to direct that an individual needs representation, and recommends changing the eligibility thresholds.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘People living below the poverty line are regularly denied legal aid by a too stringent means test.’

Issue: 7943 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll