header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

An open letter to the Lord Chancellor

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
11 February 2011 / Carol Storer
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

What future for legal aid?

In an open letter to the Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State of State for Justice, the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP, published today in NLJ, Carol Storer, director of the Legal Aid Practitioner’s Group (LAPG) asks the government to rethink its plans for the proposed changes to legal aid funding.

Dear Lord Chancellor

Next Monday, 14 February 2011, is the last date for responding to the Ministry of Justice’s Consultation Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales.

The proposals, which are estimated to have a cumulative impact of £395m–£440m on a budget of £2.1bn, will have a disproportionate impact on vulnerable women, children, black and minority ethnic clients, and those living with disability and mental health problems. 

The government plans to remove legal aid for welfare benefits work, debt matters where the client’s home is not at immediate risk, employment and many housing matters. In addition, all immigration matters will be taken out of scope where the litigant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Big tech for small firms
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
NLJ this week: Presumption of capacity reaffirmed
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
NLJ this week: Justice delayed, justice denied
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
NLJ this week: The road ahead for employment rights
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: SLAPPed shut?
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll