header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 February 2011 / Carol Storer
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

An open letter to the Lord Chancellor

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

What future for legal aid?

In an open letter to the Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State of State for Justice, the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP, published today in NLJ, Carol Storer, director of the Legal Aid Practitioner’s Group (LAPG) asks the government to rethink its plans for the proposed changes to legal aid funding.

Dear Lord Chancellor

Next Monday, 14 February 2011, is the last date for responding to the Ministry of Justice’s Consultation Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales.

The proposals, which are estimated to have a cumulative impact of £395m–£440m on a budget of £2.1bn, will have a disproportionate impact on vulnerable women, children, black and minority ethnic clients, and those living with disability and mental health problems. 

The government plans to remove legal aid for welfare benefits work, debt matters where the client’s home is not at immediate risk, employment and many housing matters. In addition, all immigration matters will be taken out of scope where the litigant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll