header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

An open letter to the Lord Chancellor

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
11 February 2011 / Carol Storer
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

What future for legal aid?

In an open letter to the Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State of State for Justice, the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP, published today in NLJ, Carol Storer, director of the Legal Aid Practitioner’s Group (LAPG) asks the government to rethink its plans for the proposed changes to legal aid funding.

Dear Lord Chancellor

Next Monday, 14 February 2011, is the last date for responding to the Ministry of Justice’s Consultation Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales.

The proposals, which are estimated to have a cumulative impact of £395m–£440m on a budget of £2.1bn, will have a disproportionate impact on vulnerable women, children, black and minority ethnic clients, and those living with disability and mental health problems. 

The government plans to remove legal aid for welfare benefits work, debt matters where the client’s home is not at immediate risk, employment and many housing matters. In addition, all immigration matters will be taken out of scope where the litigant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll