header-logo header-logo

What is ‘guidance’, & do we have to comply with it?

17 December 2020 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19 , Brexit
printer mail-detail
33609
Employment lawyer Juliet Carp considers the possibility that some pandemic-related ‘guidance’ may later prove to be wrong
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the creation of a plethora of ‘guidance’—while not technically ‘law’, much of this guidance is underpinned by real law with which we are obliged to comply.

Where do we find English law?

We might offer the following, rather simplistic, explanation to children: laws are made by Parliament and consist of primary legislation (‘Acts’ or ‘statutes’) and secondary legislation (‘statutory instruments’ or ‘regulations’). The key difference is that secondary legislation can be passed more quickly and with less rigorous parliamentary scrutiny. Both types of legislation are implemented by our ‘executive’—ie civil servants, the police etc. Ideally, legislation should be self-explanatory. Where there is ambiguity, judges help us decide what it means and, if Parliament does not like a judge’s decision, it is usually open to Parliament to change the legislation.

In reality, things are not quite so straightforward. We have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll