header-logo header-logo

What is ‘guidance’, & do we have to comply with it?

17 December 2020 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19 , Brexit
printer mail-detail
33609
Employment lawyer Juliet Carp considers the possibility that some pandemic-related ‘guidance’ may later prove to be wrong
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the creation of a plethora of ‘guidance’—while not technically ‘law’, much of this guidance is underpinned by real law with which we are obliged to comply.

Where do we find English law?

We might offer the following, rather simplistic, explanation to children: laws are made by Parliament and consist of primary legislation (‘Acts’ or ‘statutes’) and secondary legislation (‘statutory instruments’ or ‘regulations’). The key difference is that secondary legislation can be passed more quickly and with less rigorous parliamentary scrutiny. Both types of legislation are implemented by our ‘executive’—ie civil servants, the police etc. Ideally, legislation should be self-explanatory. Where there is ambiguity, judges help us decide what it means and, if Parliament does not like a judge’s decision, it is usually open to Parliament to change the legislation.

In reality, things are not quite so straightforward. We have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll