header-logo header-logo

What is ‘guidance’, & do we have to comply with it?

17 December 2020 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19 , Brexit
printer mail-detail
33609
Employment lawyer Juliet Carp considers the possibility that some pandemic-related ‘guidance’ may later prove to be wrong
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the creation of a plethora of ‘guidance’—while not technically ‘law’, much of this guidance is underpinned by real law with which we are obliged to comply.

Where do we find English law?

We might offer the following, rather simplistic, explanation to children: laws are made by Parliament and consist of primary legislation (‘Acts’ or ‘statutes’) and secondary legislation (‘statutory instruments’ or ‘regulations’). The key difference is that secondary legislation can be passed more quickly and with less rigorous parliamentary scrutiny. Both types of legislation are implemented by our ‘executive’—ie civil servants, the police etc. Ideally, legislation should be self-explanatory. Where there is ambiguity, judges help us decide what it means and, if Parliament does not like a judge’s decision, it is usually open to Parliament to change the legislation.

In reality, things are not quite so straightforward. We have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll